Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hey! Josselin Poiret skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> I don’t think I can commit to coordinating the stabilization effort >> though as I’m busy with other things this month. Would anyone like to >> take the lead on this? > > I've been slowly building up to gnome on c-u locally, with a c

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-20 Thread Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hi, > Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: > (building the info fails in the Hurd cross build), but lateron there's > another segfault. This is now also fixed, by including libc-utf8-locales-for-target as native input. Greetings, Janneke -- Janneke Nieuwenhuizen | GN

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-17 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 16:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Long story short: I’d like us to freeze and merge the branch ASAP, > notably because the glibc graft on ‘master’ leads to a bad user > experience. I’m happy with the current state of the branch and wouldn’t > mind postponing remaining u

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-17 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Guix! > > Several of us have been fiddling with the ‘core-updates’ branch for a > while. I think there’s now consensus that the branch is really > dedicated to core packages and (guix build …) modules, as embodied in > the new ‘core-packages’ team¹. >

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-15 Thread Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
Efraim Flashner writes: Hi, > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 01:55:47PM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >> Building a bare-hurd system on core-updates succeeded "not long ago" >> (after the glibc+locales patch series I think) but now fails on >> gcc-cross-sans-libc-i58

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-15 Thread Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hello, > Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: > > Hi! > >>> Long story short: I’d like us to freeze and merge the branch ASAP, >>> notably because the glibc graft on ‘master’ leads to a bad user >>> experience. I’m happy with the current state of the branch and wouldn’t >>

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-15 Thread Roman Scherer
Hello, if we include the jemalloc patch Efraim is talking about, could we please also include this one here: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68257 (gnu: mesa: Build asahi driver on aarch64) Btw, is there a way to figure out if the rebuild of jemalloc on aarch64 would affect (also rebuild) mesa? Tha

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-15 Thread Roman Scherer
Sorry, if this mail arrived in multiple parts. I somehow messed something up in my mail client. :/ Roman Scherer writes: > Hello, > > if we include the jemalloc patch Efraim is talking about, could we please > also include this one here: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68257 (gnu: mesa: Build

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-15 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 04:10:14PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > Several of us have been fiddling with the ‘core-updates’ branch for a > while. I think there’s now consensus that the branch is really > dedicated to core packages and (guix build …) modules, as embodied in > the n

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-15 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 01:55:47PM +0100, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > Hi! > > > We’ve updated GCC 11.x, glibc, binutils, and various packages from (gnu > > packages base). Notable exceptions are Coreutils, Findutils, sed, and > > tar; I tried but that’s a bit more

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-13 Thread Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hi! >> Long story short: I’d like us to freeze and merge the branch ASAP, >> notably because the glibc graft on ‘master’ leads to a bad user >> experience. I’m happy with the current state of the branch and wouldn’t >> mind postponing remaining upgrades for the next

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-12 Thread Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hi! > We’ve updated GCC 11.x, glibc, binutils, and various packages from (gnu > packages base). Notable exceptions are Coreutils, Findutils, sed, and > tar; I tried but that’s a bit more work, notably because their variants > in commencement.scm would no longer build beca

Re: An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-12 Thread Josselin Poiret
Hi everyone, Ludovic Courtès writes: > I don’t think I can commit to coordinating the stabilization effort > though as I’m busy with other things this month. Would anyone like to > take the lead on this? I've been slowly building up to gnome on c-u locally, with a couple of additional patches

An update on ‘core-updates’

2024-01-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Guix! Several of us have been fiddling with the ‘core-updates’ branch for a while. I think there’s now consensus that the branch is really dedicated to core packages and (guix build …) modules, as embodied in the new ‘core-packages’ team¹. We’ve updated GCC 11.x, glibc, binutils, and vario