Dear Paul,
> I would like to eventually package the Lethe CFD library
Nice!
Trilinos has many bells and whistles. I imagine that there will be some
significant effort required to package it. One option would be to
subdivide the library and initially package only the elements you need
for Lethe.
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 02:40:04PM +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > PETSc and Trilinos (and many other libraries available in Guix) can be
> > compiled with several different options.
> > What is the standard way to deal with this in Guix?
>
> AFAIK, there is no concrete standard way. Only what
Hi,
> PETSc and Trilinos (and many other libraries available in Guix) can be
> compiled with several different options.
> What is the standard way to deal with this in Guix?
AFAIK, there is no concrete standard way. Only what explained Arun. ;-)
> The potential problem with PETSc and Trilinos
Hi Paul,
> PETSc and Trilinos (and many other libraries available in Guix) can be
> compiled with several different options.
> What is the standard way to deal with this in Guix?
Normal Guix policy is as follows. If adding extra dependencies does not
significantly increase the size of the packag
Hi,
I would like to eventually package the Lethe CFD library [1], but it
requires a version of dealii compiled with Trilinos, which is not
currently available in Guix.
PETSc and Trilinos (and many other libraries available in Guix) can be
compiled with several different options.
What is the stand