On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 08:21:35AM +0100, Gábor Boskovits wrote:
> I was aware of the discussion thread, however I could not find out what the
> current state is? Do we plan to modify this behaviour in the next release?
I think the current state is "awaiting feedback" :)
I was aware of the discussion thread, however I could not find out what the
current state is? Do we plan to modify this behaviour in the next release?
The core-updates thing makes sense, thanks.
2017-12-03 8:19 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits :
> Ok, thanks for clarification.
> I
>
> 2017-12-03 0:29 G
Ok, thanks for clarification.
I
2017-12-03 0:29 GMT+01:00 Leo Famulari :
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 05:28:51PM +0100, Gábor Boskovits wrote:
> > Sometimes while working in guix I run into problems because:
> > 1. a tarball was removed or modified upstream
> >
> > It would be great to have the abil
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 05:28:51PM +0100, Gábor Boskovits wrote:
> Sometimes while working in guix I run into problems because:
> 1. a tarball was removed or modified upstream
>
> It would be great to have the ability to install the latest release in all
> the supported ways on all supported archi
Sometimes while working in guix I run into problems because:
1. a tarball was removed or modified upstream
It would be great to have the ability to install the latest release in all
the supported ways on all supported architectures, and have the ability do
guix pull without problems.
Last time I t
