Timothy Sample writes:
> Between the convention and the fact that “hspec-discover” is almost
> always used as a program instead of a library, I would say that it’s
> okay the way it is. Beyond that, it would be quite a bit of churn to
> change it with very little benefit.
Fair enough. I reverte
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
> Timothy Sample writes:
>
>> We already have “hspec-discover” without the “ghc” prefix. The two
>> packages look identical to me – is this an unintentional copy?
>
> Oh! I hadn't noticed!
>
> Well, is there any strong reason to use "hspec-discover" over
> "ghc-hs
Hello,
Timothy Sample writes:
> We already have “hspec-discover” without the “ghc” prefix. The two
> packages look identical to me – is this an unintentional copy?
Oh! I hadn't noticed!
Well, is there any strong reason to use "hspec-discover" over
"ghc-hspec-discover", besides that it already
Hi Nicolas,
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> ngz pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit a60448edcc85faa8b3cd4bd3ae8a336c842aad4d
> Author: Nicolas Goaziou
> AuthorDate: Sat Feb 8 15:17:15 2020 +0100
>
> gnu: Add ghc-hspec-discover.
>
> * gnu/packages/haskell
