> I finally got around to fixing it in
> a31174e896047e6a0f42b69db331fdeebb3cc995.
>
> The kludge is no longer needed!
Great. Here are updated patches:
>From 287879a825f41c46cc5091c715467e476d465def Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caleb Ristvedt
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:04:59 -0500
Subject: [PATC
Caleb Ristvedt skribis:
> As we found out on IRC yesterday, https://bugs.gnu.org/15602 is causing
> this to fail. If I understand correctly, the workaround involves trying
> to make sure that modules that use (guix memoization) are compiled
> before (guix memoization) is (and it turns out that on
Hello,
Caleb Ristvedt skribis:
>> A problem is that we should not pull in these two modules here, because
>> they are conceptually at a higher level (they have to do with talking to
>> a separate daemon process.)
>>
>> So perhaps a first step would be to re-arrange things, probably along
>> thes
> A problem is that we should not pull in these two modules here, because
> they are conceptually at a higher level (they have to do with talking to
> a separate daemon process.)
>
> So perhaps a first step would be to re-arrange things, probably along
> these lines:
>
> • Move the .drv parsing c
Hi reepca!
Caleb Ristvedt skribis:
> Changes made, though I'm not quite sure about this part:
>
>> Could you add a test in tests/store-database.scm for this bit?
>>
>>> +(when (derivation-path? real-file-name)
>>> + (register-derivation-outputs))
>
> Should that be a separate te
Changes made, though I'm not quite sure about this part:
> Could you add a test in tests/store-database.scm for this bit?
>
>> +(when (derivation-path? real-file-name)
>> + (register-derivation-outputs))
Should that be a separate test or an extension of "register-path"?
Currentl
Hi reepca,
guix-comm...@gnu.org skribis:
> commit 91cbfa8da90d8d1723da753c171a378dae13cb40
> Author: Caleb Ristvedt
> Date: Wed Jan 30 17:03:38 2019 -0600
>
> guix: store: Make register-items transactional, register drv outputs
>
> * guix/store/database.scm (SQLITE_BUSY, register-
