Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-11 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > Hi Mark, > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:03:50PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> Can we do this on core-updates instead? I'm currently working on a >> core-updates branch. I will push it soon, after I've done some basic >> testing on it. > > I would prefer a separate branch

Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-11 Thread Andreas Enge
Hi Mark, On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:03:50PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Can we do this on core-updates instead? I'm currently working on a > core-updates branch. I will push it soon, after I've done some basic > testing on it. I would prefer a separate branch - with hydra lagging behind, we t

Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-10 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > I will push this to a wip-boost branch, and try to build a dependent package > locally. I wonder if I should base wip-boost on openssl-update; but with > only 69 dependent packages (if the count is true), it probably does not > matter. I see that you pushed this branch and

Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-10 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:52:24PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> I'm not 100% sure what's happening either, but more packages are >> becoming broken over time. I think it has to do with the fact that >> 'git' is one of the broken packages, and other packages that fetch th

Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-10 Thread Andreas Enge
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:52:24PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > I'm not 100% sure what's happening either, but more packages are > becoming broken over time. I think it has to do with the fact that > 'git' is one of the broken packages, and other packages that fetch their > source code using 'git

Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-10 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:00:39PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> Boost turns out to be an important package. The fallout from this is >> 412 newly failed builds on mips64el: >> http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/105333#tabs-now-fail > > I do not quite understand this number, it

Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-09 Thread Andreas Enge
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:00:39PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Boost turns out to be an important package. The fallout from this is > 412 newly failed builds on mips64el: > http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/105333#tabs-now-fail I do not quite understand this number, it should be 65 according to the f

Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-09 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > Andreas Enge writes: > >> commit 16de69c950c473cc3d386cd7569bd1d6051614b6 >> Author: Andreas Enge >> Date: Wed Jul 8 23:18:40 2015 +0200 >> >> gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0. >> >> * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost): Update to 1.58.0. > > This fails to build o

Re: 01/01: gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0.

2015-07-08 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > commit 16de69c950c473cc3d386cd7569bd1d6051614b6 > Author: Andreas Enge > Date: Wed Jul 8 23:18:40 2015 +0200 > > gnu: boost: Update to 1.58.0. > > * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost): Update to 1.58.0. This fails to build on mips64el, where boost-1.57.0 worked