Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Nils Gillmann writes: [...] >> Can you tell me why it is safer to say perl-license instead of >> package-license perl? > > Following Ludo’s reference to “(guix licenses)” we can see this comment: > > ;; The license of Perl, GPLv1+ or Artistic (we ignore the latter

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Nils Gillmann writes: > Roel Janssen transcribed 509 bytes: >> >> Roel Janssen writes: >> >> > Ludovic Courtès writes: >> > >> >> Hi Roel, >> >> >> >> r...@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis: >> >> >> >>> +(license (package-license perl >> >> >> >> Could you use (license perl-license) in

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Nils Gillmann writes: > I guess we just are trying to prevent licensing mistakes in the future > for the hypothetical case that perl ever changes its license? Yes, exactly. Mark

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Mark H Weaver transcribed 826 bytes: > Nils Gillmann writes: > > >> > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> > > >> >> r...@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis: > >> >> > >> >>> +(license (package-license perl > >> >> > >> >> Could you use (license perl-license) instead? It doesn’t make any > >> >> di

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Nils Gillmann writes: >> > Ludovic Courtès writes: >> > >> >> r...@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis: >> >> >> >>> +(license (package-license perl >> >> >> >> Could you use (license perl-license) instead? It doesn’t make any >> >> difference in this case but it’s generally “safer” (see (gu

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Roel Janssen transcribed 509 bytes: > > Roel Janssen writes: > > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > > >> Hi Roel, > >> > >> r...@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis: > >> > >>> +(license (package-license perl > >> > >> Could you use (license perl-license) instead? It doesn’t make any > >> differ

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Roel Janssen writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hi Roel, >> >> r...@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis: >> >>> +(license (package-license perl >> >> Could you use (license perl-license) instead? It doesn’t make any >> difference in this case but it’s generally “safer” (see (guix >> lic

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Roel, > > r...@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis: > >> +(license (package-license perl > > Could you use (license perl-license) instead? It doesn’t make any > difference in this case but it’s generally “safer” (see (guix > licenses)). Of course! If I may ask,

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add perl-inline-c.

Hi Roel, r...@gnu.org (Roel Janssen) skribis: > +(license (package-license perl Could you use (license perl-license) instead? It doesn’t make any difference in this case but it’s generally “safer” (see (guix licenses)). Thanks, Ludo’.