Hello,
Chris Marusich skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> So I think what we need to do is for “guix pull-ng” to build and install
>> a complete ‘guix’ package, and to manage it pretty much like other
>> packages is managed,
>
> I think that's very reasonable. It seems more
Hi Ludo`,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> So I think what we need to do is for “guix pull-ng” to build and install
> a complete ‘guix’ package, and to manage it pretty much like other
> packages is managed,
I think that's very reasonable. It seems more intuitive than the
current way '
Hi!
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> If I understand it correctly, as part of `guix pull' we get the latest
> package definitions, but `guix' and `guix-daemon' are at the
> guix-snapshot version, aka 0.11.0-4. If instead `guix-daemon' was from
> the tip of master then it'd be at the equivalant of runn
