On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:12:09AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
> > I wonder, are there any drawbacks of making the linter check that the
> > URL provides the data named by the hash?
>
> The rationale so far was that ‘guix lint foo’ should be fast (a couple
> of seconds a
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:20:42PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
>> Oh, that's embarrassing. I must have forgotten to change the hash and
>> guix cached the tarball. Is that possible?
>
> If the hash is matched in the store, the URL is not used, so you won't
> see an incorrec
