2018-05-13 7:07 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Wurmus :
>
> Catonano writes:
>
> > Ricardo, I don't understand the problem you're raising here (I didn't
> read
> > the article yet, though)
> >
> > Would you mind to elaborate on that ?
> >
> > Why would you want to record the environment ?
>
> I want to record
Catonano writes:
> Ricardo, I don't understand the problem you're raising here (I didn't read
> the article yet, though)
>
> Would you mind to elaborate on that ?
>
> Why would you want to record the environment ?
I want to record the detected build environment so that I can restore it
at execu
2018-05-11 10:19 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Wurmus :
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > Perhaps we could add to Autoconf-Archive (if it doesn’t have such things
> > already) macros to deal with the R and Python stuff you had to deal
> > with? And then publish a simple template that people could use as a
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Perhaps we could add to Autoconf-Archive (if it doesn’t have such things
> already) macros to deal with the R and Python stuff you had to deal
> with? And then publish a simple template that people could use as a
> starting point.
I submitted my macros for R packages
Hello!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> Given the intended audience, I wonder how we could provide a simpler
>> path to achieve the same goal. It could be a set of Autoconf macros
>> leading to high-level ‘configure.ac’ files without any line of shell
>> code, or it
Hello Ricardo & all!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I’m happy to announce that the group I’m working with has released a
> preprint of a paper on reproducibility with the title:
>
> Reproducible genomics analysis pipelines with GNU Guix
> https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/04/11/29865
hi again,
and extra kudos and thanks for releasing this under a free licence! \o/
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:40:47PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > just one thing/question: in the keywords you have "reproducible
> Heh, it used to be “reproducible builds”, but the term was deemed too
> abstract for the audience of biologists, so it was decided to change it
> to “reproducible so
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I’m happy to announce that the group I’m working with has released a
> preprint of a paper on reproducibility with the title:
>
> Reproducible genomics analysis pipelines with GNU Guix
> https://www.biorxiv.org/
Hi Holger,
thanks for your comments!
> just one thing/question: in the keywords you have "reproducible
> software" but not "reproducible builds", which is kind of our "marketing
> term". Do you think you could squeeze that in?
Heh, it used to be “reproducible builds”, but the term was deemed to
10 matches
Mail list logo
