Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:03:59PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote:
>>
>> >> [...]
>> >> Move all the 3 desktop files into 'bin' output should work. (I could
>> >> patch that next day, but won't be able to test it due to slow
>> >> substitute/download/build speed though.)
>> >
>> > That
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:03:59PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote:
>
> >> [...]
> >> Move all the 3 desktop files into 'bin' output should work. (I could
> >> patch that next day, but won't be able to test it due to slow
> >> substitute/download/build speed though.)
> >
> > That should work. You can post the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:03:59PM +0800, ? wrote:
>> [...]
>> Move all the 3 desktop files into 'bin' output should work. (I could
>> patch that next day, but won't be able to test it due to slow
>> substitute/download/build speed though.)
>
> That shou
>> [...]
>> Move all the 3 desktop files into 'bin' output should work. (I could
>> patch that next day, but won't be able to test it due to slow
>> substitute/download/build speed though.)
>
> That should work. You can post the patch here so we can test, if you
> want.
Sure, here is it:
>From
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:24:47AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> It works if I remove the 'bin' output from gtk+@3.
>
> I think I was mistaken. If I don't use a separate 'bin' output, I can
> build the package, but I still get an error with `guix system build`:
>
> guix sy
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On core-updates, from 6671ce93 (gnu: ath9k-htc-firmware: Update binutils
>> patch for binutils 2.27), I can't build gtk+@3.20 because the daemon
>> finds a cycle in the references:
>>
>> --
>> starting phase `validate-runpath'
Leo Famulari writes:
> On core-updates, from 6671ce93 (gnu: ath9k-htc-firmware: Update binutils
> patch for binutils 2.27), I can't build gtk+@3.20 because the daemon
> finds a cycle in the references:
>
> --
> starting phase `validate-runpath'
> validating RUNPATH of 17 binaries in
> "/gnu/
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 01:24:47AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> It works if I remove the 'bin' output from gtk+@3.
I think I was mistaken. If I don't use a separate 'bin' output, I can
build the package, but I still get an error with `guix system build`:
guix system: error: reference to invalid o
On core-updates, from 6671ce93 (gnu: ath9k-htc-firmware: Update binutils
patch for binutils 2.27), I can't build gtk+@3.20 because the daemon
finds a cycle in the references:
--
starting phase `validate-runpath'
validating RUNPATH of 17 binaries in
"/gnu/store/dsnckvh133ndivnnbspg2yziqmlg1c4p