Leo Famulari skribis:
> Veering off-topic, I wonder what created that device node /dev/ttyS1? I
> have 32 of them, but (gnu build linux-boot) appears to only create the
> first one:
udev did!
Ludo’.
On 02/17/2017 at 17:59 Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:35:44PM -0500, myglc2 wrote:
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> I think that what you have is great. With this in my system config ...
>>
>> (agetty-service (agetty-configuration
>> (tty "ttyS1")
>> (b
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:35:44PM -0500, myglc2 wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> I think that what you have is great. With this in my system config ...
>
> (agetty-service (agetty-configuration
>(tty "ttyS1")
>(baud-rate "115200")))
>
> ... it works painlessly on
On 02/16/2017 at 02:06 Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:24:17PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> This 'extra' is a time-saving kludge. I'll add fields for all of
>> agetty's configuration options once I'm satisfied that the service works
>> on GuixSD.
>
> Here's a patch that exposes
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 08:48:28AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > Is this the right way? Or would we rather wrap only the most
> > commonly-used options, and leave an "escape hatch" as in the first
> > version of the patch? If so, which options should we expose in Scheme?
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:24:17PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> This 'extra' is a time-saving kludge. I'll add fields for all of
>> agetty's configuration options once I'm satisfied that the service works
>> on GuixSD.
>
> Here's a patch that exposes (almost all) of agett
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:24:17PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> This 'extra' is a time-saving kludge. I'll add fields for all of
> agetty's configuration options once I'm satisfied that the service works
> on GuixSD.
Here's a patch that exposes (almost all) of agetty's command-line
options.
Is th
