On Sun, 2021-04-04 at 16:14 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Maxime Devo wrote:
> > * In some places we have the following pattern:
> >
> > [...]
> I don't understand this. Why would it need to be made unconditional?
I don't understand either anymore.
> [...]
>
> At the present time, I'm more in
Hi Maxime,
Maxime Devos writes:
> On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 18:33 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Earlier, I wrote:
>> > One thing to be very careful about is to only use 'gtk-doc/stable',
>> > 'dblatex/stable', and 'imagemagick/stable' in native-inputs, and
>> > moreover to make sure that no referen
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Maxime Devos writes:
>
>> guix build $PACKAGES
>> # maybe guix build $PACKAGES --no-grafts?
>> guix graph --type=references $PACKAGES
>> # ^ look in output for "imagemagick".
>
> For the record, it seems that this command gives false positives.
Sorry, I was mistaken here
Hi Maxime,
Maxime Devos writes:
> On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 17:37 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> One thing to be very careful about is to only use 'gtk-doc/stable',
>> 'dblatex/stable', and 'imagemagick/stable' in native-inputs, and
>> moreover to make sure that no references to these */stable packa
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Earlier, I wrote:
>> One thing to be very careful about is to only use 'gtk-doc/stable',
>> 'dblatex/stable', and 'imagemagick/stable' in native-inputs, and
>> moreover to make sure that no references to these */stable packages
>> remain in any package outputs.
>>
>> Of
On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 18:33 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Earlier, I wrote:
> > One thing to be very careful about is to only use 'gtk-doc/stable',
> > 'dblatex/stable', and 'imagemagick/stable' in native-inputs, and
> > moreover to make sure that no references to these */stable packages
> > remain
Earlier, I wrote:
> One thing to be very careful about is to only use 'gtk-doc/stable',
> 'dblatex/stable', and 'imagemagick/stable' in native-inputs, and
> moreover to make sure that no references to these */stable packages
> remain in any package outputs.
>
> Of course, if any package retains ref
On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 17:37 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Maxime Devos writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 20:01 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Maxime wrote:
> > > > What does ‘guix refresh --list-dependent imagemagick@6.9.11-48’
> > > > output now?
> > > When I last checked, it re
Maxime Devos writes:
> On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 20:01 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> [...]
>> Maxime wrote:
>> > What does ‘guix refresh --list-dependent imagemagick@6.9.11-48’
>> > output now?
>
>> When I last checked, it reported on the order of 2400 dependent package
>> rebuilds.
>
> I should hav
On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 20:01 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> [...]
> Maxime wrote:
> > What does ‘guix refresh --list-dependent imagemagick@6.9.11-48’
> > output now?
> When I last checked, it reported on the order of 2400 dependent package
> rebuilds.
I should have written imagemagick@6.9.12-4 here
Hi Maxime,
Maxime Devos writes:
> This approach (& patches) look good to me.
Thanks for looking.
> What does ‘guix refresh --list-dependent imagemagick@6.9.11-48’
> output now?
When I last checked, it reported on the order of 2400 dependent package
rebuilds.
> If it there are many dependent p
On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 09:09 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hello Guix,
>
> Here's a proposed patch set that will henceforth enable us to freely
> update ImageMagick (and dblatex, and gtk-doc) on our 'master' branch
> without grafts. This is done by adding variables 'imagemagick/stable',
> 'dblatex
Hello Guix,
Here's a proposed patch set that will henceforth enable us to freely
update ImageMagick (and dblatex, and gtk-doc) on our 'master' branch
without grafts. This is done by adding variables 'imagemagick/stable',
'dblatex/stable', and 'gtk-doc/stable', which are then used as
'native-input
13 matches
Mail list logo
