Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-21 Thread Attila Lendvai
> I would advise against running a multitude of personal channels in favor > of collaborating with others on a much smaller number of channels -- and i agree. i meant to use the expression 'let a thousand flowers bloom' to be more about freedom and (friendly) competition, not the actual number.

Re: [bug#75145] [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-20 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi 45mg, 45mg <45mg.wri...@gmail.com> writes: [...] > Thanks, good to know. Will try to keep that in mind. I do wish there was > something I could do to get things moving faster, but I guess this is a > limitation of projects that run on (primarily) unpaid volunteer work :/ As mentioned by Rica

Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-17 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Attila Lendvai writes: >> instead of calling for >> the proliferation of private channels, a different kind of unmanageable >> structurelessness. > > not private channels, simply channels that are not owned/controlled by > the exact same set of committers as guix proper, and not demanding the >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-17 Thread Attila Lendvai
> instead of calling for > the proliferation of private channels, a different kind of unmanageable > structurelessness. not private channels, simply channels that are not owned/controlled by the exact same set of committers as guix proper, and not demanding the exact same requirements from the

Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-13 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Attila Lendvai writes: >> > this patch failed to get any attention in two weeks >> >> >> Two weeks isn't a long time in free software projects. A more common >> time frame would be between one year and eighteen months. > > > ...and with such a delay most patches bitrot beyond recognition, then >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-13 Thread Attila Lendvai
> > this patch failed to get any attention in two weeks > > > Two weeks isn't a long time in free software projects. A more common > time frame would be between one year and eighteen months. ...and with such a delay most patches bitrot beyond recognition, then after one too many burdensome rebas

Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-12 Thread 45mg
Hi Guix, I'd just like to apologise for CC'ing Guix-Devel at this point; this patch isn't nearly critical enough to warrant the noise after two weeks' wait - which, as Felix points out, really isn't that long in the grand scheme of things. I got impatient; I'm sorry. I'll try to remember to remove

Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-09 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi 45mg, On Thu, Jan 09 2025, 45mg wrote: > this patch failed to get any attention in two weeks Two weeks isn't a long time in free software projects. A more common time frame would be between one year and eighteen months. > I'm CC'ing guix-devel on this one Pings are generally frowned upon,

Re: [bug#75145] [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-09 Thread 45mg
Hi Arnaud! Arnaud Daby-Seesaram writes: > Adding a default configuration could one day be interesting. However, > I would rather (personal opinion) see the default value in an exported > variable %default-networkmanager-files (non-contractual name) if needed. > This variable could become the de

Re: [bug#75145] [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-09 Thread Arnaud Daby-Seesaram
Hi, Thank you for your patch. 45mg <45mg.wri...@gmail.com> writes: > As the first revision of this patch failed to get any attention in two weeks, > I'm CC'ing guix-devel on this one, hoping it'll get reviewed this time. Let me > know if I should have done anything differently; I'm still relative

[PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field.

2025-01-09 Thread 45mg
Hi Guix, As the first revision of this patch failed to get any attention in two weeks, I'm CC'ing guix-devel on this one, hoping it'll get reviewed this time. Let me know if I should have done anything differently; I'm still relatively new to contributing. This patch allows users to specify confi