Alex Kost skribis:
> So I suggest to add a phase for deleting non-".el[c]" files from the
> ".guix.d/package" directory.
Agreed; what about putting READMEs etc. elsewhere, like under
‘share/doc/PACKAGE’ if we want to preserve them?
> And just in case: I have nothing against GNU ELPA repository
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
> Federico Beffa (2015-07-09 23:41 +0300) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
>>> Federico Beffa (2015-07-08 23:22 +0300) wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
> A side note: I think genera
Federico Beffa (2015-07-09 23:41 +0300) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
>> Federico Beffa (2015-07-08 23:22 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
A side note: I think generally it would be preferable to use an upstream
release
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
> Federico Beffa (2015-07-08 23:22 +0300) wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
>>> A side note: I think generally it would be preferable to use an upstream
>>> release in the package recipe rather than to use a melpa(-stabl
Federico Beffa (2015-07-08 23:22 +0300) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
>> A side note: I think generally it would be preferable to use an upstream
>> release in the package recipe rather than to use a melpa(-stable) URL,
>> i.e.:
>>
>> http://foo-upstream.org/foo-0.1.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
> A side note: I think generally it would be preferable to use an upstream
> release in the package recipe rather than to use a melpa(-stable) URL,
> i.e.:
>
> http://foo-upstream.org/foo-0.1.tar.gz instead of
> http://stable.melpa.org/packages
Federico Beffa (2015-07-07 10:21 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> Wouldn't it be better to name it "elpa-build-system" as that's what it
>> is in my opinion, since it does not retrieve the source directly from
>> upstream but from ELPA/MELPA/... "repositories" instead.
>
> The build system
Alex Kost writes:
> Wouldn't it be better to name it "elpa-build-system" as that's what it
> is in my opinion, since it does not retrieve the source directly from
> upstream but from ELPA/MELPA/... "repositories" instead.
The build system doesn't assume anything about the source location.
>
> I
Wouldn't it be better to name it "elpa-build-system" as that's what it
is in my opinion, since it does not retrieve the source directly from
upstream but from ELPA/MELPA/... "repositories" instead.
I imagine there may appear another build system for simple emacs
packages (that don't provide Makefi
'match-lambda' appears not to be documented in Guile.)
Oops.
> From e24d0b11280f4fcd106f371b98b7481f7c044eb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:10:05 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] build: Add 'emacs-build-system'.
>
> *
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Federico Beffa skribis:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Thompson, David
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Federico Beffa wrote:
But, my question was NOT: how can I see white spaces. Rather: is there
a Gu
>
> (match-lambda
> ((label . directory)
>(emacs-package? (package-name+version directory
>
> (Which means the ‘first’ above should have been ‘second’?)
I'm not sure I understand your comment:
'package-name->name+version' takes a package name, therefor
Federico Beffa skribis:
> From 725d42eb3e5c44bcec1bd81988d1f952e6be02a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:10:05 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] build: Add 'emacs-build-system'.
>
> * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add 'guix/buil
Federico Beffa skribis:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Thompson, David
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Federico Beffa wrote:
>>>
>>> But, my question was NOT: how can I see white spaces. Rather: is there
>>> a Guix coding style "rule" which states that white spaces there are
>>
ward-paragraph' (if that's what is
> bound to M-up/down for you).
>
> --
> Alex
From 725d42eb3e5c44bcec1bd81988d1f952e6be02a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Federico Beffa
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:10:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] build: Add 'emacs-build-syste
Federico Beffa (2015-06-22 22:33 +0300) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
>
>> Well, these trailing spaces are artifacts of (inaccurate) coding. Emacs
>> can't read user's mind to decide if the spaces are redundant or
>> intended.
>
> No need to read the mind... you just
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Thompson, David
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Federico Beffa wrote:
>>
>> But, my question was NOT: how can I see white spaces. Rather: is there
>> a Guix coding style "rule" which states that white spaces there are
>> undesired.
>>
>> I personally pre
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Federico Beffa wrote:
>
> But, my question was NOT: how can I see white spaces. Rather: is there
> a Guix coding style "rule" which states that white spaces there are
> undesired.
>
> I personally prefer to have them, because then, if I use M-up/down, I
> move to t
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
> Federico Beffa (2015-06-22 11:51 +0300) wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
new file mode 100644
index 000..da2b594
--- /dev/null
+++ b/guix/build-system/emacs.scm
>>> [...]
+
Federico Beffa (2015-06-22 11:51 +0300) wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000..da2b594
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/guix/build-system/emacs.scm
>> [...]
>>> +#:tests? ,tests?
>>> +#:phases ,pha
Federico Beffa writes:
> I'm following the Emacs behavior. Is there a convention to suppress
> all spaces (in spite of what Emacs does)?
'M-x delete-trailing-whitespace' ?
--
Mathieu Lirzin
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Alex Kost wrote:
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..da2b594
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/guix/build-system/emacs.scm
> [...]
>> +#:tests? ,tests?
>> +#:phases ,phases
>> +#:outputs %outputs
>> +
Federico Beffa (2015-06-21 11:31 +0300) wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
> index 3ca105a..00fe5bb 100644
> --- a/doc/guix.texi
> +++ b/doc/guix.texi
> @@ -2404,6 +2404,17 @@ Which Haskell compiler is used can be specified with
> the @code{#:haskell}
> parameter which def
A new 'emacs-buld-system'.
Fede
From 9c090ddd7de011b369208cdeb28eb3eaa5dc6011 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Federico Beffa
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:10:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] build: Add 'emacs-build-system'.
* Makefile.am (MODULES): Add 'guix/build-system/ema
24 matches
Mail list logo
