Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> On 12/01/2013 11:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Cyril Roelandt skribis:
>>
>>> On 11/30/2013 11:01 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Why is gobject-introspection always accompanied by libffi? Should
libffi be a propagated input of gobject-introspection?
>>>
>>> I'
On 12/01/2013 11:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
On 11/30/2013 11:01 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Why is gobject-introspection always accompanied by libffi? Should
libffi be a propagated input of gobject-introspection?
I've just checked that. Atk, pango (and similar pac
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> On 11/30/2013 11:01 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Why is gobject-introspection always accompanied by libffi? Should
>> libffi be a propagated input of gobject-introspection?
>
> I've just checked that. Atk, pango (and similar packages) do not
> require libffi. However,
On 11/30/2013 11:01 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Why is gobject-introspection always accompanied by libffi? Should
libffi be a propagated input of gobject-introspection?
I've just checked that. Atk, pango (and similar packages) do not require
libffi. However, if they are compiled without libffi
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (atk, gdk-pixbuf, gtk+, pango): enable introspection
Looks good. One question though:
[...]
> (inputs `(("glib" ,glib)
> + ("gobject-introspection" ,gobject-introspection)
> + ("libffi" ,libffi)
[...]
> +`(("go
* gnu/packages/gtk.scm (atk, gdk-pixbuf, gtk+, pango): enable introspection
---
gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 43 +++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
index dff98b9..9048fd0 100644
--- a/gnu/
