Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

Dylan Jeffers writes: > Alright I think this is the final patch :) > > From c6f8d8948c0bf0b740022f5e4860c6adca267431 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dylan Jeffers > Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:22:49 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-kivy. > > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-kivy, python

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:37:49 -0700 Dylan Jeffers wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:28:20 -0700 > Dylan Jeffers wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 05:27:59 -0400 > > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > > > Dylan Jeffers writes: > > > > > > > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > >> We generally prefer

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:28:20 -0700 Dylan Jeffers wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 05:27:59 -0400 > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > Dylan Jeffers writes: > > > > > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > >> We generally prefer to use tarball releases, unless there is a > > >> compelling reason to use a non-rel

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 05:27:59 -0400 Mark H Weaver wrote: > Dylan Jeffers writes: > > > Mark H Weaver wrote: > >> We generally prefer to use tarball releases, unless there is a > >> compelling reason to use a non-release commit. > >> > >> Is there a compelling reason? If not, please use the

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

Dylan Jeffers writes: > Mark H Weaver wrote: >> We generally prefer to use tarball releases, unless there is a >> compelling reason to use a non-release commit. >> >> Is there a compelling reason? If not, please use the 1.9.1 release >> tarball from

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:21:31 -0700 Dylan Jeffers wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:06:48 -0400 > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > Dylan Jeffers writes: > > > > > From 25cd777ff3a2429cbb257e02603d6bef78d1564f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > > > 2001 From: Dylan Jeffers > > > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:15:47 -