On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I think using (package-version gnome-desktop) would make the intent
> clear, and the breakage that would occur would give a heads-up and an
> incentive to fix it.
>
> How does that sound?
OK, fine.
Fede
Federico Beffa skribis:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> +;; The version of this package should be the same as the version of
>>> +;; gnome-desktop.
>>> +(define-public gnome-themes-standard
>>> + (package
>>> +(name "gnome-themes-standard")
>>> +(version "3
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> +;; The version of this package should be the same as the version of
>> +;; gnome-desktop.
>> +(define-public gnome-themes-standard
>> + (package
>> +(name "gnome-themes-standard")
>> +(version "3.10.0")
>
> Please use (version (p
Federico Beffa skribis:
> From 7439f19c1f2966466da88554478b796c3bfca429 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 18:09:33 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add gnome-themes-standard.
>
> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome-themes-stand
Package for GNOME 3 default theme.
Regards,
Fede
From 7439f19c1f2966466da88554478b796c3bfca429 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Federico Beffa
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 18:09:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add gnome-themes-standard.
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome-themes-standard): New variable