Marius Bakke writes:
> I wonder if we should seek a statement from KDE allowing the use of
> GPL3+ for our packages.
>
> Meanwhile, the way I read it, this package should be '(gpl2 gpl3 lpgl2.0
> lgpl2.0+). I would change the comment to something like:
>
> ;; This is distributed under either gpl2
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 21.11.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Marius Bakke:
>>> > +(license (list license:gpl2+ license:lgpl2.0 license:lgpl2.0+
>> Please clarify. Is it all of them, or either? Or is it mostly gpl2+, but
>> some files are covered by the other two?
>
> Thansk for reviewing that
Am 21.11.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Marius Bakke:
>> > +(license (list license:gpl2+ license:lgpl2.0 license:lgpl2.0+
> Please clarify. Is it all of them, or either? Or is it mostly gpl2+, but
> some files are covered by the other two?
Thansk for reviewing that quick.
The list of licenses is t
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> * gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (frameworkintegration): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 51
> +
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frame
* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (frameworkintegration): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 51 +
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm
index 9df37ac..0e6b8fb 100644
