> That’ll happen, someday, but even then, I’m not sure we’ll remove
> labels; at least we won’t remove them overnight, for sure. ;-)
That may be a good fit for a guix lint warning, maybe first as a
--pedantic mode, then after the first rush of newbies-editing-the-world,
it can be turned into --We
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis:
> On 2016-07-21 18:06, l...@gnu.org wrote:
(inputs `(("somethingsilly" ,glib "bin")))
>>
>> This "somethingsilly" is just a label that allows you to refer to an
>> input on the build side, in idioms like:
>>
>> (assoc-ref inputs "somethingsilly")
>> => "/
Ahoy Ludo',
On 2016-07-21 18:06, l...@gnu.org wrote:
(inputs `(("somethingsilly" ,glib "bin")))
This "somethingsilly" is just a label that allows you to refer to an
input on the build side, in idioms like:
(assoc-ref inputs "somethingsilly")
=> "/gnu/store/…-glib-42.0-bin"
I remember
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> David Craven skribis:
>>
I think packages with a “bin” output are not always used as native
inputs, so I would drop this rule.
>>>
>>> From searching the code-base we have I couldn't find a counter ex
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> David Craven skribis:
>
>>> I think packages with a “bin” output are not always used as native
>>> inputs, so I would drop this rule.
>>
>> From searching the code-base we have I couldn't find a counter example. Do
>> you think it's ok to
David Craven skribis:
>> I think packages with a “bin” output are not always used as native
>> inputs, so I would drop this rule.
>
> From searching the code-base we have I couldn't find a counter example. Do
> you think it's ok to check for glib:bin specifically?
Yes, sounds good to me.
Howeve
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:50:49PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> Hi
>
> > I think packages with a “bin” output are not always used as native
> > inputs, so I would drop this rule.
>
> From searching the code-base we have I couldn't find a counter example. Do
> you think it's ok to check for glib:b
Hi
> I think packages with a “bin” output are not always used as native
> inputs, so I would drop this rule.
>From searching the code-base we have I couldn't find a counter example. Do
you think it's ok to check for glib:bin specifically?
Thanks
David
Hi!
David Craven skribis:
> * guix/scripts/lint.scm (check-inputs-should-be-native): Check that packages
> with suffix ':bin' and 'intltool', 'itstool' are in native-inputs.
I think packages with a “bin” output are not always used as native
inputs, so I would drop this rule.
However, the rule
* guix/scripts/lint.scm (check-inputs-should-be-native): Check that packages
with suffix ':bin' and 'intltool', 'itstool' are in native-inputs.
---
guix/scripts/lint.scm | 18 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/lint.scm b/guix/scripts/lin
10 matches
Mail list logo
