David Craven skribis:
>> Add #:allowed-references () to make sure you get the desired effect.
>
> Isn't this a key of the gnu-build-system?
Oh indeed (and this is ridiculous). Sorry for the confusion.
Ludo’.
> Add #:allowed-references () to make sure you get the desired effect.
Isn't this a key of the gnu-build-system?
David Craven skribis:
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (btrfs-progs/static): New variable.
[...]
> +(define-public btrfs-progs/static
> + (package
> +(name "btrfs-progs-static")
> +(version (package-version btrfs-progs))
> +(build-system trivial-build-system)
> +(source #f)
> +(a
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (btrfs-progs/static): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index a4639bd..8b6cce4 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:01:46AM +0100, tobias.geerinckx.r...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
>
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (btrfs-progs): New variable.
[...]
> +(arguments
> + '(#:tests? #f)) ;no test suite
I altered this to run `make test`
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (btrfs-progs): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 34 ++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index e7f7bcd..33cf534 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/li