On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 07:46:53PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> David Craven writes:
>
> > * gnu/packages/flex.scm (flex-2.6.1): New variable.
>
> This is newer than what we currently have (2.6.0). I know it's late in
> the core-updates cycle, but maybe we can squeeze in a flex upgrade?
I saw t
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 07:46:53PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> David Craven writes:
>
> > * gnu/packages/flex.scm (flex-2.6.1): New variable.
>
> This is newer than what we currently have (2.6.0). I know it's late in
> the core-updates cycle, but maybe we can squeeze in a flex upgrade?
Unfortu
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 07:46:53PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> David Craven writes:
>
> > * gnu/packages/flex.scm (flex-2.6.1): New variable.
>
> This is newer than what we currently have (2.6.0). I know it's late in
> the core-updates cycle, but maybe we can squeeze in a flex upgrade?
It's al
David Craven writes:
> * gnu/packages/flex.scm (flex-2.6.1): New variable.
This is newer than what we currently have (2.6.0). I know it's late in
the core-updates cycle, but maybe we can squeeze in a flex upgrade?
I haven't tried building the series, but the patches LGTM overall.
signature.as
* gnu/packages/flex.scm (flex-2.6.1): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/flex.scm | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/flex.scm b/gnu/packages/flex.scm
index 20aff19..7b59085 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/flex.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/flex.scm
@@ -78,3 +78,17 @@ r