On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 06:28:45PM +0200, Federico Beffa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hello Federico,
> >
> > Federico Beffa skribis:
> >
> >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> >> From 7875840eb0f0d0d844da40735faabd10b791f0dd Mon Sep
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Federico,
>
> Federico Beffa skribis:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> From 7875840eb0f0d0d844da40735faabd10b791f0dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Federico Beffa
>> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:01:11
Hello Federico,
Federico Beffa skribis:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
[...]
>> Could you separate these different changes into different patches,
>> please?
>
> I've split them.
Thanks for taking the time.
> From c25b941dc4a0b5d04a871edb590a728b6075b081 Mon Sep 17
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Federico,
>
> it’s a bit unfortunate to mix moving of packages between modules with a
> fix and a feature addition (search paths). I think the move to a new
> module is not necessary.
I moved Chez Scheme to a new module because I'm addi
Hi Federico,
it’s a bit unfortunate to mix moving of packages between modules with a
fix and a feature addition (search paths). I think the move to a new
module is not necessary.
Could you separate these different changes into different patches,
please?
~~ Ricardo
From e03430859c864c3b868994143fe729f0558297ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Federico Beffa
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 21:23:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] gnu: chez-scheme: Add search-path and Fix i686 build.
* gnu/packages/scheme.scm (chez-scheme, nanopass, stex): Move variables ...
* gnu
