Hello Nicolas,
Nicolas Graves writes:
> The first/independent part of 68315 has already been merged, now it's
> time for discussion on how/when/with which process to get that one
> merged.
>
> I've pinged the other issue this morning, hopefully we can get a
> discussion going there!
That's great
Sorry Sergio I read you late!
Nice, indeed debugging symbols would be great in this context.
The first/independent part of 68315 has already been merged, now it's
time for discussion on how/when/with which process to get that one
merged.
I've pinged the other issue this morning, hopefully we c
Nicolas Graves writes:
> Made some progress and I'll rework on the patches tonight.
I'm looking forward to it!
> Current workflow is the following :
>
> In a guix with v2 patches and current guix-local:
> cd /tmp
> mkdir -p hello
> cd hello
> guix local instantiate hello --> downloads and unpack
Made some progress and I'll rework on the patches tonight.
Current workflow is the following :
In a guix with v2 patches and current guix-local:
cd /tmp
mkdir -p hello
cd hello
guix local instantiate hello --> downloads and unpacks hello's source
cd hello*
guix local build hello --> builds locall
On 2025-03-21 11:20, Sergio Pastor Pérez wrote:
>
> The version 2 has less patches. Do I need to apply only v2?
Yes, I merged some patches because my mail are capped to 200/hour and I
reached that in v1.
--
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves
Hello Nicolas!
I've been looking forward to this early 2024 effort to
allow partial builds.
Today I've decided to try it out. I got some issues when running the
'guix.scm' example you provided with your patch series applied over
`412f411d4f8780e6b60b448caae17f01c09be0eb`.
--8<---cut h
ngra...@ngraves.fr writes:
> Hi Sergio,
>
> I worked towards it quite recently ! Latest efforts are from yesterday even ;)
>
> The latest working example on my side is (used in guile-emacs repo as
> guix.scm with command guix build -f guix.scm) :
> https://git.sr.ht/~ngraves/guix-stack/tree/maste
Hi Sergio,
I worked towards it quite recently ! Latest efforts are from yesterday even ;)
The latest working example on my side is (used in guile-emacs repo as guix.scm
with command guix build -f guix.scm) :
https://git.sr.ht/~ngraves/guix-stack/tree/master/item/examples/guile-emacs.scm
The co
On 2024-01-08 08:51, Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
System distribution." wrote:
> Rationale:
> Almost all build-systems are defined with gexpressions in functions
> that return derivations. Derivations are not easily extensible while
> gexps are. An example usage is give
Here's a more complete proof of concept:
The attached file guix.scm, when run a checkout of emacs branch emacs-29
with guix build -f guix.scm will :
- compile everything as if run locally but with the patches provided by
guix sources.
- a local edit and the rerun of guix build -f guix.scm will on
Rationale:
Almost all build-systems are defined with gexpressions in functions
that return derivations. Derivations are not easily extensible while
gexps are. An example usage is given below.
This is a pretty big rewrite that should recompile almost all packages,
but a lot of grafting happens such
11 matches
Mail list logo
