Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update

2016-07-03 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:54:02PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: > > > Leo Famulari writes: > >> [...] > >> > >> With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at > >> least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update

2016-07-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: > Leo Famulari writes: >> [...] >> >> With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at >> least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the >> manpage timestamps. > Cool! > >> >> These changes will require 142 rebuilds,

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update

2016-07-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Leo Famulari skribis: > Since version 1.4.0, Sphinx has respected the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH > environment variable for the timestamps it puts in generated > documentation [0]. Awesome! > This patch series updates Sphinx to the latest version, 1.4.4, and > provides all the new dependencies.

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update

2016-07-02 Thread 宋文武
Leo Famulari writes: > [...] > > With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at > least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the > manpage timestamps. Cool! > > These changes will require 142 rebuilds, mostly of Python packages, but > also of libreoffic

[PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update

2016-07-01 Thread Leo Famulari
Since version 1.4.0, Sphinx has respected the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable for the timestamps it puts in generated documentation [0]. This patch series updates Sphinx to the latest version, 1.4.4, and provides all the new dependencies. The final commit in the series requires the new Sphi