Re: [PATCH 0/2] native-search-paths for GHC

2015-10-16 Thread Eric Bavier
Hello Guix, With all the Haskell packages that have made their way to the list, I was wondering if anyone had any further comments on these patches. `~Eric On 2015-10-06 16:26, ericbav...@openmailbox.org wrote: From: Eric Bavier The first of these patches lets search-path-as-list function

Re: [PATCH 0/2] native-search-paths for GHC

2015-10-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Eric Bavier skribis: > On 2015-10-07 11:07, Federico Beffa wrote: [...] >> * If I understand correctly, the configuration files of dependencies >> are >> copied in a unique directory for each package. Instead of copying >> would a symlink work? (There are literally thousands of packages on

Re: [PATCH 0/2] native-search-paths for GHC

2015-10-07 Thread Eric Bavier
On 2015-10-07 11:07, Federico Beffa wrote: ericbav...@openmailbox.org writes: From: Eric Bavier The first of these patches lets search-path-as-list function correctly when a pattern is given and the 'directory file type is specified. The second adds a native-search-paths field to our ghc p

Re: [PATCH 0/2] native-search-paths for GHC

2015-10-07 Thread Federico Beffa
ericbav...@openmailbox.org writes: > From: Eric Bavier > > The first of these patches lets search-path-as-list function correctly when a > pattern is given and the 'directory file type is specified. > > The second adds a native-search-paths field to our ghc package. It modifies > our haskell-bui

[PATCH 0/2] native-search-paths for GHC

2015-10-06 Thread ericbavier
From: Eric Bavier The first of these patches lets search-path-as-list function correctly when a pattern is given and the 'directory file type is specified. The second adds a native-search-paths field to our ghc package. It modifies our haskell-build-system to install a package-specific package