Ludovic Courtès writes:
> David Thompson skribis:
>
>> Regarding sdl-union:
>>
>> * This package isn't useful for users, only developers. Should I keep it
>> private so that it doesn't show up in package searches?
>
> Probably, yes. But could you remind me why it’s needed? ISTR from
> earlier
David Thompson skribis:
> Regarding sdl-union:
>
> * This package isn't useful for users, only developers. Should I keep it
> private so that it doesn't show up in package searches?
Probably, yes. But could you remind me why it’s needed? ISTR from
earlier discussions that some tools (‘sdl-con
Hello all,
The following patch set adds two new packages:
1) sdl-union: A union-build of SDL and it's utility libraries
2) guile-sdl: A Guile wrapper for SDL
Neither of these patches are ready for upstream. I'm posting them now
because I need some help to fix the remaining issues.
Regarding sd
