On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
>> Any patches related to bootstrapping gcc? I'm getting lib/lib64 confusion.
>
>
> Yes, that's been one issue.
>
> Attached are the patches I have so far. Hopefully they can get you a bit
> further. I've been able to build a number of packag
Eric confirmed that this patch solved his issue so I've pushed it as
commit 39e336b.
- Dave
On 2015-08-17 15:46, Claes Wallin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
I have experimented with this a bit lately. It works to some extent,
but I have had to apply a few patches to some package recipes. Some
packages have failing tests (where presumably they would pass
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
> On 2015-08-17 15:46, Claes Wallin wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have experimented with this a bit lately. It works to some extent,
>>> but I have had to apply a few patches to some package recipes
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
> I have experimented with this a bit lately. It works to some extent,
> but I have had to apply a few patches to some package recipes. Some
> packages have failing tests (where presumably they would pass or be
> skipped in the chroot), which
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Thompson, David
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
> wrote:
>>> I think that to really make unprivileged use of Guix work acceptably,
>>> we need to use the user namespaces feature first introduced in Linux
>>> 3.8. This would allow un
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Thompson, David
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Eric Bavier
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:45:28 +0200
>>> Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote:
>
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual
I'm almost done talking to myself, I promise. This is just all very exciting.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
> wrote:
>
>> Now I'm doing this:
>>
>> git clean -fxd && # recover from previous attempts
>> git checkou
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Thompson, David
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Eric Bavier
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:45:28 +0200
>> Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote:
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Build-Environment-Setup
>>>
>>> "If you are installing Guix
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Eric Bavier wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:45:28 +0200
> Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
>> wrote:
>> > [Reposting with correct sender. Sorry, David.]
>> >
>> > Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
> wrote:
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Build-Environment-Setup
>>>
>>> "If you are installing Guix as an unprivileged user, it is still
>>> possible to run guix-dae
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> Now I'm doing this:
>
> git clean -fxd && # recover from previous attempts
> git checkout HEAD . && # ditto
> gettextize --po-dir=po{/guix,/packages,} &&
> sed -re '/^[[:blank:]]*po\/(guix|packages)\/Makefile.in[[:blank:]]*$/d'
> -i con
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eric Bavier
wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:45:28 +0200
> Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
>> wrote:
>> > [Reposting with correct sender. Sorry, David.]
>> >
>> > Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and r
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:45:28 +0200
Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
> wrote:
> > [Reposting with correct sender. Sorry, David.]
> >
> > Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and run guix on a
> > machine at work, where I'm not root.
> >
> >
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)
wrote:
> [Reposting with correct sender. Sorry, David.]
>
> Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and run guix on a machine at
> work, where I'm not root.
>
> I was planning to run guix as a stow of steroids. But I'm still wondering
> whe
[Reposting with correct sender. Sorry, David.]
Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and run guix on a machine at
work, where I'm not root.
I was planning to run guix as a stow of steroids. But I'm still wondering
whether what I'm attempting is even intended to be possible? Of course, I
w
On 16-Aug-2015 2:19 pm, "David Thompson" wrote:
Great! I ran into this when trying to compile and run guix on a machine at
work, where I'm not root.
I was planning to run guix as a stow of steroids. But I'm still wondering
whether what I'm attempting is even intended to be possible? Of course, I
>From 57faa1368cb96dd94cc32c18a0e6b63285ca8e1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 08:08:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] syscalls: setns: Skip binding if there is no such C function.
On systems with a glibc prior to 2.14, the 'setns' function is not avail
18 matches
Mail list logo