l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> I see that you still pushed a 'teckit' update. It probably would have
>> been better to push that together with the 'texlive' update, whenever
>> that happens. At a time when new users are trying out the 0.8.3
>> release, the
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I see that you still pushed a 'teckit' update. It probably would have
> been better to push that together with the 'texlive' update, whenever
> that happens. At a time when new users are trying out the 0.8.3
> release, the teckit update forced over 200 rebuilds starting
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:57:01PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Yes, all the modified variables must be mentioned in the log.
>
> Thanks for the confirmation!
>
>> LGTM, thanks!
>
> Actually, it looks good, but does not work, I forgot to test the package...
> When runni
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:57:01PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Yes, all the modified variables must be mentioned in the log.
Thanks for the confirmation!
> LGTM, thanks!
Actually, it looks good, but does not work, I forgot to test the package...
When running "pdflatex something.tex", there i
01
> From: Andreas Enge
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:50:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: texlive: Update to 2015.
>
> * gnu/packages/texlive.scm (texlive-extra-src, texlive-texmf-src,
> texlive-texmf, texlive): Update to 2015.
> (texlive-bin): Update to 2015. Add inputs gmp and
And here comes the patch to update texlive. Is it useful to mention the
modifications in the non-public source variables?
Andreas
>From e5959b4901fc60a4e6a3bdbaffb0d33d853a1b94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Enge
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:50:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: texl
