Re: [PATCH] gnu: pbr: Update to 1.6.0

2015-09-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Cyril Roelandt skribis: > On 09/07/2015 11:07 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: >> This looks harmless to push > > Btw, is it OK to directly push such changes? Yes, see “Commit Access” in ‘HACKING’. Basically if there’s too much rebuilding, or a potential for disruption or controversy, post it here. Let

Re: [PATCH] gnu: pbr: Update to 1.6.0

2015-09-07 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 09/07/2015 11:07 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: > This looks harmless to push Btw, is it OK to directly push such changes? I feel like they usually pollute the mailing list more than anything else :/ Cyril.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: pbr: Update to 1.6.0

2015-09-07 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 09/07/2015 11:07 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: > This looks harmless to push, if you checked that the dependent > python-oslotest still builds. > Pushed in ea8e40d031c3295805dc9357098c2c13aa516e1a . Cyril.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: pbr: Update to 1.6.0

2015-09-07 Thread Andreas Enge
This looks harmless to push, if you checked that the dependent python-oslotest still builds. Andreas

[PATCH] gnu: pbr: Update to 1.6.0

2015-09-06 Thread Cyril Roelandt
* gnu/packages/openstack.scm (python-pbr): Update to 1.6.0. --- gnu/packages/openstack.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/openstack.scm b/gnu/packages/openstack.scm index 8e96455..d4d6813 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/openstack.scm +++ b/gnu/packag