Alex Kost skribis:
> ng0 (2016-12-06 20:42 +) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost writes:
> [...]
>>> I've just noticed that there is 'bin-install' phase right before it, so
>>> I think an additional phase is not needed at all, the required
>>> symlinking can be done in that 'bin-install' phase.
>>
>> Oka
ng0 (2016-12-06 20:42 +) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
[...]
>> I've just noticed that there is 'bin-install' phase right before it, so
>> I think an additional phase is not needed at all, the required
>> symlinking can be done in that 'bin-install' phase.
>
> Okay, I did not want to touch that
Alex Kost writes:
> ng0 (2016-12-06 20:04 +) wrote:
>
>> * gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice)[arguments]: Create symlink to
>> libreoffice in new phase.
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm | 11 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/
ng0 (2016-12-06 20:04 +) wrote:
> * gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice)[arguments]: Create symlink to
> libreoffice in new phase.
> ---
> gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm | 11 ++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm b/gnu
* gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice)[arguments]: Create symlink to
libreoffice in new phase.
---
gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm b/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
index e02e4f4cd..5f14357
* gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice)[arguments]: Create symlink to
libreoffice in new phase.
---
gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm b/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
index e02e4f4cd..8e08450a1 100644
--- a/gnu
Hartmut Goebel (2016-12-06 11:42 +0100) wrote:
> Am 05.12.2016 um 15:16 schrieb ng0:
>> Okay, I have no preference for the symlink type or how it's
>> done.
>> Feel free to co-author your bits, there's no way I'm building
>> libreoffice for the 8th time in 3 days for this minor change.
>
> Fair po
Am 05.12.2016 um 15:16 schrieb ng0:
> Okay, I have no preference for the symlink type or how it's
> done.
> Feel free to co-author your bits, there's no way I'm building
> libreoffice for the 8th time in 3 days for this minor change.
Fair point :-) If I'm the only one asking for relative sym-links
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 05.12.2016 um 13:25 schrieb ng0:
>> + (symlink
>> + (string-append out "/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice")
>> + (string-append bin "/libreoffice")))
>
> That's a good idea. But why not a relative sym-link?
>
> --
> R
Am 05.12.2016 um 13:25 schrieb ng0:
> + (symlink
> + (string-append out "/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice")
> + (string-append bin "/libreoffice")))
That's a good idea. But why not a relative sym-link?
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebe
* gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm (libreoffice)[arguments] Create symlink to
libreoffice in new phase.
---
gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm b/gnu/packages/libreoffice.scm
index e02e4f4cd..245e932d4 100644
--- a/g
11 matches
Mail list logo