Alex Vong writes:
>>> Besides, the security bug in which 'lcms-fix-out-of-bounds-read.patch'
>>> fixed has been assigned CVE-2016-10165 according to [0], should we
>>> change the name of the patch?
>>>
>>> [0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367357
>>
>> Good catch. Would you like t
Marius Bakke writes:
> Alex Vong writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch update lcms to 2.8:
>
> Thank you for this!
>
Thanks for the review too!
>> Besides, the security bug in which 'lcms-fix-out-of-bounds-read.patch'
>> fixed has been assigned CVE-2016-10165 according to [0], should we
>> change t
Alex Vong writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch update lcms to 2.8:
Thank you for this!
> Besides, the security bug in which 'lcms-fix-out-of-bounds-read.patch'
> fixed has been assigned CVE-2016-10165 according to [0], should we
> change the name of the patch?
>
> [0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Hi,
This patch update lcms to 2.8:
From 5f70defc2a1867aa557d5ddc5fbae9456df035df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Vong
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 19:48:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: lcms: Update to 2.8.
* gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (lcms): Update to 2.8.
---
gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm | 5
