On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:25:37AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> I could try to update curl and see whether the test problem still occurs.
Things are worse with curl 7.35.0 (which requires python for at least one
of its tests): Test 172 still fails, and additionally, 1221 and 1222 fail.
So a patch
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:05:28AM +0100, Sree Harsha Totakura wrote:
>> The testcase 172 tests cookies whose expiration value is hard-coded to
>> 1391252187, which is Feb 1, 2014. Hence, the testcase is failing for a
>> week :)
>
> Totally crazy!
In people’s mind, Feb.
Hi!
On 02/10/2014 11:33 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
> see my message from February 5:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2014-02/msg00057.html
>
>
To summarise, I do not know what happens.
The testcase 172 tests cookies whose expiration value is hard-coded to
1391252187, which is Feb 1
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:05:28AM +0100, Sree Harsha Totakura wrote:
> The testcase 172 tests cookies whose expiration value is hard-coded to
> 1391252187, which is Feb 1, 2014. Hence, the testcase is failing for a
> week :)
Totally crazy!
Andreas
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:05:31AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Well, let’s see how we can fix things from here.
finally, this was not such a big problem, I had just added libmicrohttpd
and done a bit of reformatting following Mark's suggestions (which you
have also done independently).
Hi,
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:15:30PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Sree Harsha Totakura skribis:
>>
>> > * gnunet/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet): New variable.
>> > * gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-scheduler.patch: New file.
>> > * gnu/package/patches/gnu
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:15:30PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Sree Harsha Totakura skribis:
>
> > * gnunet/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet): New variable.
> > * gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-scheduler.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-tests.patch: New fil
Sree Harsha Totakura skribis:
> * gnunet/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet): New variable.
> * gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-scheduler.patch: New file.
> * gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-tests.patch: New file.
> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add the above two patch files.
>
> Co-a
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> What do you think?
Right, we should generally stick to the “standard rule”, as noted in
‘HACKING’.
Ludo’.
Hi,
Sree Harsha Totakura writes:
> +'(#:phases
> +;; swap check and install phases and set paths to installed binaries
> +(alist-cons-before
> + 'check 'set-path-for-check
> + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> + (let ((out (assoc-ref output
* gnunet/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet): New variable.
* gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-scheduler.patch: New file.
* gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-tests.patch: New file.
* gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add the above two patch files.
Co-authored-by: Andreas Enge
---
gnu-system.a
* gnunet/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet): New variable.
* gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-scheduler.patch: New file.
* gnu/package/patches/gnunet-fix-tests.patch: New file.
* gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add the above two patch files.
---
gnu-system.am
12 matches
Mail list logo
