Thompson, David (2015-10-13 17:01 +0300) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
>> Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-12 19:35 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>>
>> [...]
Actually, I think it will be more clear to use 'sdl-union' here, because
the workaround is more
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-12 19:35 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
> [...]
>>> Actually, I think it will be more clear to use 'sdl-union' here, because
>>> the workaround is more concise, WDYT?
>>
>> Indeed.
>
> What about using 'sdl-uni
s well?
I have switched ‘abbaye’ to 'modify-phases' syntax, but since it is
trivial I didn't send the patch for it (I hope it's OK).
>From 310cd7241fdb8e5c37e8649473fb3d6a04e898ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Kost
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:47:15 +0300
Subject: [PAT
