Okay, thanks for the explanations!
Andreas
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:47:26PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> I'm familiar with these packages, and I tend to agree that they are so
>> closely tied that it's reasonable to commit them together.
>
> That is not common practice so far, no? I do not see what would be
> th
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:47:26PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I'm familiar with these packages, and I tend to agree that they are so
> closely tied that it's reasonable to commit them together.
That is not common practice so far, no? I do not see what would be
the problem when committing them s
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:00:56PM +0100, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote:
>> This actually adds three packages but they're closely tied together.
>
> Still, could you commit them as three separate packages?
I'm familiar with these packages, and I tend to agree that the
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:00:56PM +0100, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote:
> This actually adds three packages but they're closely tied together.
Still, could you commit them as three separate packages?
> +(description "This package contains the support scripts called upon by
> +libquvi to
This actually adds three packages but they're closely tied together.
>From 5e10d1af45eceff13d764e6b13cc3498477b080d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 22:35:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] gnu: Add quvi.
* gnu/packages/web.s
