John J Foerch skribis:
> From d4738938d325dcf0452346f48f0bf02c020bd6d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "John J. Foerch"
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:36:52 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ola.
>
> * gnu/packages/ola.scm (ola): New variable.
Applied, thanks!
Ludo’.
t;> John: could you send an updated patch incorporating suggestions from
>>> Alex and Marius? The rest LGTM.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Ludo’.
>>
>> How about lighting.scm? There are a few other lighting programs that
>> could potentiall
John J Foerch skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Marius Bakke skribis:
>>
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
gnu/packages/ola.scm | 9 +++--
>>>
>>> Perhaps this could be added to something like automation.s
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Marius Bakke skribis:
>
>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>> gnu/local.mk | 1 +
>>> gnu/packages/ola.scm | 9 +++--
>>
>> Perhaps this could be added to something like automation.scm?
>
> Makes sense to me, unless the
Hi,
Marius Bakke skribis:
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> gnu/local.mk | 1 +
>> gnu/packages/ola.scm | 9 +++--
>
> Perhaps this could be added to something like automation.scm?
Makes sense to me, unless there are many other OLA-related packages.
John: could y
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> gnu/local.mk | 1 +
> gnu/packages/ola.scm | 9 +++--
Perhaps this could be added to something like automation.scm?
Or iot.scm?
> +(synopsis "Framework for controlling entertainment lighting equipment")
> +(description "The O
Alex Vong writes:
> Hi,
>
> The patch builds on my machine and lgtm. I make some minor changes (in
> diff format):
>
> 1. Add ola.scm to gnu/local.mk, so that the build system knows the
>presence of gnu/package/ola.scm. The commit message should say this
>as well.
>
> 2. Move protobuf fro
in, I
> think that this can be added later.
>
> Please let me know of anything that should be changed.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> John Foerch
>
>
> From f600e8a43997efecb9587a9c39579a7d6f3291f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "John J. Foerch"
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug
ould be changed.
Thank you,
--
John Foerch
>From f600e8a43997efecb9587a9c39579a7d6f3291f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "John J. Foerch"
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:36:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ola.
* gnu/packages/ola.scm (ola): New variable.
--
Hi all,
I have made some progress with the ola package, but have run into
difficulty related to python used in its test phase. Relevant code and
logs can be found here:
The package definition: http://retroj.net/scratch/ola-guix/ola.scm
The build log: http://retroj.net/scratch/ola-guix/ola-g
John J Foerch writes:
> ren...@openmailbox.org writes:
>
>> John,
>>
>>> Thank you so much for doing this. If 'make check' succeeds, those are
>>> the main tests, but to check installation, I would look for the
>>> following programs being installed:
>>>
>>> ola ola_e131
ren...@openmailbox.org writes:
> John,
>
>> Thank you so much for doing this. If 'make check' succeeds, those are
>> the main tests, but to check installation, I would look for the
>> following programs being installed:
>>
>> ola ola_e131ola_plugin_state ola_rdm_se
John,
Thank you so much for doing this. If 'make check' succeeds, those are
the main tests, but to check installation, I would look for the
following programs being installed:
ola ola_e131ola_plugin_state
ola_rdm_set
ola_set_priority ola_trigger o
ren...@openmailbox.org writes:
> Hello Guix,
>
>> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:14:09 -0400
>> From: John J Foerch
>>
>> Hi, I have a favor to ask of anybody in the guix community - is there
>> anybody who would be willing to finish this package for me, since I
>> can't build and test it? This is a
ake a real test to see if it works?
ThanksFrom 562f3f6d4446fa68c21f1c42c0f39bf2ac145935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rene Saavedra
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:36:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ola.
* gnu/packages/ola.scm (ola): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/ola.scm
15 matches
Mail list logo