On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 05:44:27PM +, ng0 wrote:
> From f6ea8a17772b7d3b80a603d7aef576bf13e13be5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:46:46 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gloox.
>
> * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (gloox): New variable.
Thank
had a long discussion and are very strict in their testing, looking
>> at the tests comparing libressl and openssl builds I did there was no
>> failure and if it won't work I'll notice with 0ad. I'm positive that it
>> works.
>
>> Subject: [PATC
had a long discussion and are very strict in their testing, looking
>> at the tests comparing libressl and openssl builds I did there was no
>> failure and if it won't work I'll notice with 0ad. I'm positive that it
>> works.
>
>> Subject: [PATC
at the tests comparing libressl and openssl builds I did there was no
> failure and if it won't work I'll notice with 0ad. I'm positive that it
> works.
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gloox.
>
> * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (gloox): New variable.
> +(inputs
&
plan with some
possible paths regarding libressl in general.
> From 1dc99c1336e5e372e06914a06eec67faac1b70d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:46:46 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gloox.
>
> * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (gloox): New variable.
>
and if it won't work I'll notice with 0ad. I'm positive that it
works.
From 1dc99c1336e5e372e06914a06eec67faac1b70d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:46:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gloox.
* gnu/packages/messaging.scm (gloox): New variable.
---
g
