Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 06:35:43PM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser-next): New variable.
>>
>>> +(version "20160428.4c8b3de")
>>
>> Looks good, but can you make the version string in the style desc
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 06:35:43PM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser-next): New variable.
>
>> +(version "20160428.4c8b3de")
>
> Looks good, but can you make the version string in the style described
> in 7.6.3 Version Numbers?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 06:35:43PM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser-next): New variable.
> +(version "20160428.4c8b3de")
Looks good, but can you make the version string in the style described
in 7.6.3 Version Numbers?
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix
istopher Allan Webber
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:53:50 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add geiser-next.
Also, I previously committed to this repository in 2015; add self to copyright
headers for that year too.
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (geiser-next): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 28 +++
If you want to hack trying out guile-next, you can't use the geiser
package. Fortunately, the git version of geiser supports guile-next /
2.2 / (2.1?) so, here's geiser-next!
Not sure if other people care enough to have a geiser-next package, but
since we're Guile based here, I figured other peop
