Marius Bakke writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Just to piggy-back on this discussion, I'm attempting to package
>> "Hedgewars" and needed this patch to get fpc working properly:
>
> Oops, found one more patch in that old branch. @Kei, feel free to squash
> this into the original patch:
Patch
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> ... but it turns out that gpc patches gcc parts - and the most recent
> patch is for gcc 4.0.3 - which we don't carry.
Actually, the most recent patch is for 4.3, which is why I’ve packaged gcc-4.3:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
Marius Bakke writes:
> Just to piggy-back on this discussion, I'm attempting to package
> "Hedgewars" and needed this patch to get fpc working properly:
Oops, found one more patch in that old branch. @Kei, feel free to squash
this into the original patch:
From cb94a2c4c697541183cb912039399df54e
Just to piggy-back on this discussion, I'm attempting to package
"Hedgewars" and needed this patch to get fpc working properly:
From 4f76fb12f031652e11063c0fb37949229caa45cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marius Bakke
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:39:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: fpc: Make sure it f
Hi,
to experiment, I tried this:
(define-module (wip pascal)
#:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
#:use-module (guix packages)
#:use-module (guix download)
#:use-module (guix git-download)
#:use-module (guix hg-download)
#:use-module (guix utils)
#:use-module (guix build
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Danny Milosavljevic writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary")
>>>+ "fpc-bin.tar")
>>>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")
>>
>> Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi,
>
>>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary")
>>+ "fpc-bin.tar")
>>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")
>
> Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't it be untarred immediately from
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi,
>
>>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary")
>>+ "fpc-bin.tar")
>>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")
>
> Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't it be untarred immediately from
>
Hi,
>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary")
>+ "fpc-bin.tar")
>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")
Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't it be untarred immediately from where
it is? If it is useful, maybe add
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi Kei,
>
> is anything holding this up?
>
> I've tested it and can confirm it works fine.
Not that I can remember. I believe it was just waiting for review. If
this counts as a positive review I can see about tidying it up if
necessary and pushing it to master.
s
Hi Kei,
is anything holding this up?
I've tested it and can confirm it works fine.
uccessfully.
From e5f92d59faecf2be251375f01df0a1601f4990d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kei Kebreau
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:18:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc.
* gnu/packages/pascal.scm: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/fpc-reproducibility.scm: New file.
* gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYST
s, the former upload was missing the crucial changes in the
configure phase. Please use this patch instead.
From e5c2e4b67a05f6ddf1b5db917ea6da924cfe0bc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kei Kebreau
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:49:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc.
* gnu/packages/pascal.scm: New file
0 2001
From: Kei Kebreau
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 22:58:22 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc.
* gnu/packages/pascal.scm: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/fpc-reproducibility.scm: New file.
* gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add pascal.scm.
(dist_patch_DATA): Register patch.
---
gnu/lo
This is a patch that adds a package for the Free Pascal Compiler.
Can someone verify that this builds reproducibly on an i386 machine?
From 5352fa71ccba41acf104512bbfeb5311ddd97ab9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kei Kebreau
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:36:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc
15 matches
Mail list logo
