Ludovic Courtès asked:
> Anyway, I agree that it’s a major inconvenience, but I wonder if we
> should be concerned about shipping without testing. What do people
> think?
I have no objection.
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 12:12:54AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> The samples wouldn’t really have to be “packaged”: they’d just be an
>> input. For someone using substitutes, the samples are not going to be a
>> problem (because they’ll never be downloaded.) However,
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 12:12:54AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The samples wouldn’t really have to be “packaged”: they’d just be an
> input. For someone using substitutes, the samples are not going to be a
> problem (because they’ll never be downloaded.) However, it is indeed a
> problem when
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 09:44:26PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:50:54PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> I just submitted a bug report for the failure on i686:
>https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3177#no1
Well, it looks as if "make check" is not the pr
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:50:54PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> I just submitted a bug report for the failure on i686:
>>https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3177#no1
>
> Well, it looks as if "make check" is not the preferred way of testing ffmpeg.
> Rather, one should down
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:50:54PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> I just submitted a bug report for the failure on i686:
>https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3177#no1
Well, it looks as if "make check" is not the preferred way of testing ffmpeg.
Rather, one should download about 750 MB of video sample
I just submitted a bug report for the failure on i686:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3177#no1
Unfortunately, there is not much information I could give.
Andreas
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 12:37:20AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I have a test failure on x86_64 (for
> /nix/store/iz59b5w12xj4p9yf2mn9vbg7i69vvnks-ffmpeg-2.1):
This is the exact same hash that I compiled without problem. Could you try
a few times to see whether it is deterministic? Or maybe dis
I have a test failure on x86_64 (for
/nix/store/iz59b5w12xj4p9yf2mn9vbg7i69vvnks-ffmpeg-2.1):
--8<---cut here---start->8---
TESTlavf-xwd
--- ./tests/ref/lavf/xwd2013-10-28 00:58:06.0 +
+++ tests/data/fate/lavf-xwd2013-11-01 23:32:31.0
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:38:23PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > +(synopsis "audio and video framework")
> Start with a capital letter.
Okay, I corrected and pushed it.
Notice that there are plenty of optional inputs, so that people wishing to
train their packaging skills have lots of opp
Andreas Enge skribis:
> From 4495e12c987a6a0749db8724e8d4d2a7ac546f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Enge
> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:15:46 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ffmpeg.
>
> * gnu/packages/video.scm: New file.
> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): A
Hello,
the attached patch add ffmpeg. Comments are welcome.
Andreas
>From 4495e12c987a6a0749db8724e8d4d2a7ac546f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Enge
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:15:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ffmpeg.
* gnu/packages/video.scm: New file.
* gnu-system
12 matches
Mail list logo