Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm

2016-01-19 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> I would rather use , >>> which is likely more stable, and keep the comment about the lack of a >>> separate license file. >>> >>> Otherwise LGTM, than

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm

2016-01-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> I would rather use , >> which is likely more stable, and keep the comment about the lack of a >> separate license file. >> >> Otherwise LGTM, thanks! >> >> Ludo’. > > Okay, I did th

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm

2016-01-18 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Ludovic Courtès writes: > I would rather use , > which is likely more stable, and keep the comment about the lack of a > separate license file. > > Otherwise LGTM, thanks! > > Ludo’. Okay, I did that, and then also handled Leo's suggestions, and

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm

2016-01-18 Thread Leo Famulari
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:25:16 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm. > > * gnu/packages/mail.scm (fdm): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/mail.scm | 36 > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/mail.scm b/gnu

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm

2016-01-18 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > From c0d0fde9785680a3642e2cd54f46c3b447cfbb1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Christopher Allan Webber > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:25:16 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm. > > * gnu/packages/mail.scm (fdm): New variable. [...

[PATCH] gnu: Add fdm

2016-01-18 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Hello all, I've packaged fdm, a mail distribution tool. Look okay to merge? >From c0d0fde9785680a3642e2cd54f46c3b447cfbb1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christopher Allan Webber Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:25:16 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add fdm. * gnu/packages/mail.scm (fdm): New