Alex Kost skribis:
> Ouch, yes, 'second' is 'cadr', my bad. Actually I think 'first',
> 'second', etc. are not much better then 'car', 'cadr', etc. It is
> usually possible and desirable to avoid such things, although I confess
> I use 'car'-s sometimes (when Ludovic doesn't see :-)).
Bah, cau
Hi!
Alex Vong skribis:
> On 06/10/2015, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> It’s not uncommon, indeed. However, the details on how to bootstrap are
>> not standard: Often ‘autoreconf -vfi’ will do, sometimes it’s
>> ‘./bootstrap’, sometimes ‘./autogen.sh’, etc.
>>
>> Now the proposed build syste
Mathieu Lirzin (2015-10-06 18:06 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Vong writes:
>
>> On 05/10/2015, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>>> Alex Vong writes:
+
+;;; Procedures to manupulate build flags, similar to dpkg-buildflags.
+;;;
+;;; The data strcture flag-list is constrcuted by (flag-list
Alex Vong writes:
> On 05/10/2015, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>> Alex Vong writes:
>>> +
>>> +;;; Procedures to manupulate build flags, similar to dpkg-buildflags.
>>> +;;;
>>> +;;; The data strcture flag-list is constrcuted by (flag-list
>>> ...)
>> ^^
>>
Alex Vong (2015-10-06 16:43 +0300) wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 06/10/2015, Alex Kost wrote:
[...]
>>> +;;; selectors of flag-sublist
>>> +(define (flag-type flag-sublist)
>>> + (car flag-sublist))
>>> +(define (flag-string-list flag-sublist)
>>> + (cdr flag-sublist))
>>
>> IMO it is clearer to wri
Hi Ludovic,
On 06/10/2015, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Alex Vong skribis:
>
>> On 05/10/2015, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>>> Alex Vong writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I'm not competent enough to judge if it's a useful build-system to add
>>> but
>>> this should be done in another commit and in
>>> “guix/guix/
Hi Alex,
On 06/10/2015, Alex Kost wrote:
> Hello and thank you for contributing. This is a tremendous patch for
> the first attempt!
>
> As Mathieu noted, if this auxiliary code for adding 'flags' is needed,
> it should be separated from the package commit and it shouldn't be
> placed in the pac
Alex Vong skribis:
> On 05/10/2015, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>> Alex Vong writes:
[...]
>> I'm not competent enough to judge if it's a useful build-system to add but
>> this should be done in another commit and in
>> “guix/guix/build/bootstap-build-system.scm” if yes.
>>
> I should be more a new
Hi Mathieu,
On 05/10/2015, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> Alex Vong writes:
>
>> From e5155b52f636bfee849268b19b81f5b6608540fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Vong
>> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:49:49 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Mlucas.
>>
>> * g
Hello and thank you for contributing. This is a tremendous patch for
the first attempt!
As Mathieu noted, if this auxiliary code for adding 'flags' is needed,
it should be separated from the package commit and it shouldn't be
placed in the package module.
You will probably receive useful comment
Alex Vong writes:
> From e5155b52f636bfee849268b19b81f5b6608540fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Vong
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:49:49 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Mlucas.
>
> * gnu/packages/mlucas.scm: New file.
> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Regist
From e5155b52f636bfee849268b19b81f5b6608540fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Vong
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:49:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Mlucas.
* gnu/packages/mlucas.scm: New file.
* gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Register it.
---
gnu-system.am | 1 +
gnu/packages
12 matches
Mail list logo
