Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-31 02:20 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> OK, I'm attaching a patch. Is “Co-authored-by …” enough or should you
>>> be credited in some other way?
>>
>> It’s enough.
>>
I’m thinking perhaps we should do something similar for the des
Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-31 02:20 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> OK, I'm attaching a patch. Is “Co-authored-by …” enough or should you
>> be credited in some other way?
>
> It’s enough.
>
>>> I’m thinking perhaps we should do something similar for the description
>>> itself, like displa
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-29 19:25 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> What would think of a patch like this:
>
> [...]
>
>> (defun guix-info-insert-entry (entry entry-type &optional indent-level)
>>"Insert ENTRY of ENTRY-TYPE into the current info buffer.
>> If INDENT-LEVEL
Alex Kost skribis:
> OK, I'm attaching a patch. Is “Co-authored-by …” enough or should you
> be credited in some other way?
It’s enough.
>> I’m thinking perhaps we should do something similar for the description
>> itself, like display it right below the synopsis. Thoughts?
>
> I think a simp
Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-30 16:16 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
[...]
>> Thanks again, I really like your suggestion, I just prefer to keep
>> previous possibilities instead of replacing them with the new ones.
>
> Yes, why not. I’m a bit concerned about the cost of keeping several
> vari
Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-29 19:25 +0300) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What would think of a patch like this:
[...]
> (defun guix-info-insert-entry (entry entry-type &optional indent-level)
>"Insert ENTRY of ENTRY-TYPE into the current info buffer.
> If INDENT-LEVEL is non-nil, indent displayed info
Hello,
What would think of a patch like this:
diff --git a/emacs/guix-info.el b/emacs/guix-info.el
index 551d79a..c3499e4e 100644
--- a/emacs/guix-info.el
+++ b/emacs/guix-info.el
@@ -198,13 +198,27 @@ ENTRIES should have a form of `guix-entries'."
entries
gu
