Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ben Woodcroft writes:
>
>> Pushed as 917a2a58.
>
> Yay! This allows us to strike off another item from the list of
> features to add before the 0.9.1 release.
+1 :-)
We have even fewer excuses to have outdated packages. ;-)
Ludo’.
Ben Woodcroft writes:
> Pushed as 917a2a58.
Yay! This allows us to strike off another item from the list of
features to add before the 0.9.1 release.
Thank you!
~~ Ricardo
On 23/02/16 08:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[ ... ]
On 04/01/16 06:46, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
It seems I miscounted before, but now it is 129 of 146 github
"release" packages recognised with 28 suggesting an update - see the
end of email for details. There is one false
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
> Unfortunately I found a further bug - the updated URL for the new
> package was actually the old URL not the updated one, and fixing this
> required some refactoring.
OK.
> I'm afraid I'm almost out of time for this until the end of March, so
> if there are any further
On 21/02/16 13:13, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
+ #:use-module (guix import github)
Oops, forgot to remove this line which I was using for debug. Reattached.
>From 29dc5a809e6d8796279911a993ef1b2237c810ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Woodcroft
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:18:05 +1000
Subject: [PATC
Hi again,
Thanks for the comments Ludo.
Unfortunately I found a further bug - the updated URL for the new
package was actually the old URL not the updated one, and fixing this
required some refactoring.
I'm afraid I'm almost out of time for this until the end of March, so if
there are any f
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> +(define (latest-release guix-package)
>> + "Return an for the latest release of GUIX-PACKAGE."
>> + (let* ((pkg (specification->package guix-package))
>
> Someone (Ricardo?) proposed recently to pass a package object instead of
> a package name to ‘latest-release’.
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
> It seems I miscounted before, but now it is 129 of 146 github
> "release" packages recognised with 28 suggesting an update - see the
> end of email for details. There is one false positive:
>
> gnu/packages/ocaml.scm:202:13: camlp4 would be upgraded from 4.02+6 to
> 4.02.
Thanks for the encouraging words. Here's the next revision.
On 16/11/15 19:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi!
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
Importing from GitHub seems very non-trivial, but can we update?
There's a number of issues with the attached patch but so far out of
the 171 github package in gui
Hi!
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
> Importing from GitHub seems very non-trivial, but can we update?
> There's a number of issues with the attached patch but so far out of
> the 171 github package in guix, it recognizes 101, and 17 are detected
> as out of date (see below).
Woow, nice!
> I have two q
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:32:40 +1000
Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Importing from GitHub seems very non-trivial, but can we update? There's
> a number of issues with the attached patch but so far out of the 171
> github package in guix, it recognizes 101, and 17 are detected as out of
> date (
Hi,
Importing from GitHub seems very non-trivial, but can we update? There's
a number of issues with the attached patch but so far out of the 171
github package in guix, it recognizes 101, and 17 are detected as out of
date (see below).
I have two questions:
1. Some guess-work is required t
12 matches
Mail list logo
