2dd968734831eb372fcf502dcfaad7623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: David Thompson
>> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:01:54 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] build: ruby: Rewrite build system to use gem archives.
>>
>> Co-Authored-By: Pjotr Prins
>>
>> * guix/build-syst
d get to work on 'guix
> import gem' if there are no objections.
No objections here.
> From ee027442dd968734831eb372fcf502dcfaad7623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Thompson
> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:01:54 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] build: ruby: Rewrite build system to use gem archive
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:34:44AM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> making packaging better for everyone. So, if we have to disable some
> test suites to get our Ruby support off the ground, so be it.
It is actually not a big deal for gem writers to include their tests
(most have them). Amounts to
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Thompson, David writes:
>
>>> The major change from the previous version of this patch is that I
>>> figured how to unpack the source gem, allow the package build script
>>> to make any necessary dynamic patches, and then install a repack
are of
this. Now, we can more easily deal with it by asking the 'gem'
utility to generate a gemspec for us based on the source gem archive.
Hope that wasn't too confusing for the non-Rubyists.
TIA for review.
- Dave
From 17b7307b11dd5825d7ff881624c4b823056bed50 Mon Sep 17 00:
Thompson, David writes:
>> The major change from the previous version of this patch is that I
>> figured how to unpack the source gem, allow the package build script
>> to make any necessary dynamic patches, and then install a repacked gem
>> as opposed to the source gem.
>
> I found a problem w
a repacked gem
> as opposed to the source gem.
>
> - Dave
> From ee027442dd968734831eb372fcf502dcfaad7623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Thompson
> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:01:54 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] build: ruby: Rewrite build system to use gem archives.
>
o unpack the source gem, allow the package build script
to make any necessary dynamic patches, and then install a repacked gem
as opposed to the source gem.
- Dave
From ee027442dd968734831eb372fcf502dcfaad7623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:01:54 -0400
Subject:
Pjotr Prins writes:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:09:20AM -0400, David Thompson wrote:
>> See:
>> http://help.rubygems.org/discussions/problems/21223-invalid-content-type-header-when-downloading-gem-archive?unresolve=true
>
> Could it be this works in guile 2.0.12?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/arch
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:09:20AM -0400, David Thompson wrote:
> See:
> http://help.rubygems.org/discussions/problems/21223-invalid-content-type-header-when-downloading-gem-archive?unresolve=true
Could it be this works in guile 2.0.12?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2015-02/msg000
type-header-when-downloading-gem-archive?unresolve=true
Without further ado, the patch:
>From 70c827becb2ef3909e817091676425eacb32d381 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:01:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] build: ruby: Rewrite build system to use gem archives.
Co-Aut
11 matches
Mail list logo