Re: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.

2016-03-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mar 2016 22:18:48 +0100 >>> Subject: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers. >>> >>> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix package): Suggest `guix.scm'. >>> --- >>> doc/guix.texi | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 dele

Re: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.

2016-03-10 Thread Thompson, David
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >> From fc6dd2108dae76e09e1bfcd6d04c36943469434f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen >> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:18:48 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] Suggest `guix

Re: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.

2016-03-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > From fc6dd2108dae76e09e1bfcd6d04c36943469434f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:18:48 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers. > > * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix pack

[PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.

2016-03-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hi, In reference to ponderings on #guix, find minor doc patch attached. Greetings, Jan >From fc6dd2108dae76e09e1bfcd6d04c36943469434f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:18:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers