Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-16 Thread Jookia
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:40:46PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Would a ‘mapped-device’ type where both ‘source’ and ‘target’ are lists > adequately model Linux’s notion of mapped devices? I don't know, the problem is things like LVM create multiple mapped devices rather than just one. So it do

Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >> > I'd really like to discuss how much I needed to break to get the >> > mapped-devices, >> > file-systems and swap-devices to just 'work'. I even had

Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-14 Thread Jean Louis
Let me give some tips when making this: The system must be able to encrypt: - if possible whole / though I personally don't prefer it like that - to encrypt /home on a device - to encrypt /tmp (very important) - to encrypt swap On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > J

Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-11 Thread Jookia
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:30:10PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis: > > > I'd really like to discuss how much I needed to break to get the > > mapped-devices, > > file-systems and swap-devices to just 'work'. I even had to make a function > > to > > return a map

Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis: > I'd really like to discuss how much I needed to break to get the > mapped-devices, > file-systems and swap-devices to just 'work'. I even had to make a function to > return a mapped-device type, and have swap-devices not do dependency tests > since > I techni

Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-10 Thread Jookia
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:10:09PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis: > > > So I've come up with the following hack commit that effectively > > stops any sort of dependency management and adds some new targets > > for LVM and LUKS with a keyfile. > > > > Here's my c

Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis: > So I've come up with the following hack commit that effectively > stops any sort of dependency management and adds some new targets > for LVM and LUKS with a keyfile. > > Here's my current setup, take note that order of mapped devices > matter since there's no

Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-10 Thread Jookia
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:48:25AM +0100, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote: > FYI this landed in my Gmail spam folder. Maybe because of the > all-caps. :-) Haha wow, I hope nobody else who uses gmail cares about this patch. > Taylan Jookia.

Re: [PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-09 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
FYI this landed in my Gmail spam folder. Maybe because of the all-caps. :-) Taylan

[PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-09 Thread Jookia
DISCLMAIMER: This commit isn't meant for merging, so donut merge it. It's meant for people to use until we get something better. There's also code I haven't fully checked is needed (particularly mknodes) so there's duplicates. Use this at the risk of having to ask me to fix it and possibly have me

[PATCH] DISCUSSION: Jookia's Libreboot+LUKS+LVM FDE patch.

2016-03-09 Thread Jookia
DISCLMAIMER: This commit isn't meant for merging, so donut merge it. It's meant for people to use until we get something better. There's also code I haven't fully checked is needed (particularly mknodes) so there's duplicates. Use this at the risk of having to ask me to fix it and possibly have me