Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-09-24 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Mark, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:59:06PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > The test target appears to only do something if TARGET is not set: > Since we do pass TARGET=SICORTEX the tests are skipped. I don’t know if > there’s a good reason for this. It looks a bit like

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-08-24 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> Andreas Enge writes: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:59:06PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: The test target appears to only do something if TARGET is not set: Since we do pass TARGET=SICORTEX the tests are skipped. I don’t

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-07-22 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > I will test on armhf as well; currently waiting for gfortran to compile. And here's what happens on armhf: --8<---cut here---start->8--- gcc -O2 -Wall -DF_INTERFACE_GFORT -fPIC -DDYNAMIC_ARCH -DNO_LAPACK -DNO_LAPACKE -DSMP_SERVER -DNO_

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-07-22 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > Andreas Enge writes: > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:59:06PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> The test target appears to only do something if TARGET is not set: >>> Since we do pass TARGET=SICORTEX the tests are skipped. I don’t know if >>> there’s a good reason for this

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-07-22 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:59:06PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> The test target appears to only do something if TARGET is not set: >> Since we do pass TARGET=SICORTEX the tests are skipped. I don’t know if >> there’s a good reason for this. > > It looks a bit like a fla

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-07-22 Thread Andreas Enge
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:59:06PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > The test target appears to only do something if TARGET is not set: > Since we do pass TARGET=SICORTEX the tests are skipped. I don’t know if > there’s a good reason for this. It looks a bit like a flawed logic to skip tests in cros

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-07-22 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Mark H Weaver writes: >> With this patch, openblas builds successfully on mips64el, although I >> cannot say whether it works, since there are no tests. > > I've since learned that normally tests are run during the 'build' phase, > but that doesn't seem to be happening anymore on MIPS with this

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-07-21 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Attached is a patch that *might* fix the build of OpenBLAS on MIPS. >> >> The LOONGSON3A and LOONGSON3B targets both enable the use of special >> extended instructions which may not be available on other MIPS CPUs. >> This patch forces the SICO

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-07-21 Thread Mark H Weaver
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Attached is a patch that *might* fix the build of OpenBLAS on MIPS. > > The LOONGSON3A and LOONGSON3B targets both enable the use of special > extended instructions which may not be available on other MIPS CPUs. > This patch forces the SICORTEX target to be used, which sh

[PATCH] Attempt to fix OpenBLAS on MIPS.

2015-07-20 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Attached is a patch that *might* fix the build of OpenBLAS on MIPS. The LOONGSON3A and LOONGSON3B targets both enable the use of special extended instructions which may not be available on other MIPS CPUs. This patch forces the SICORTEX target to be used, which should limit the code to only standa