Marek Benc skribis:
> On 09/02/2014 02:29 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> Could you send the patch (with the added comments) as an attachment,
>> because the mail client apparently mangled it?
>
> Okay, It's as an attachment. Here's the changelog entries:
>
> 2014-09-02 Marek Benc
> * gnu/
On 09/02/2014 02:29 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Marek Benc skribis:
On 09/02/2014 10:19 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
Shouldn’t it be
https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/files/... ? (This is
the URL given on the home page.)
Actually, no. The actual home page, according to
Marek Benc skribis:
> On 09/02/2014 10:19 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> Shouldn’t it be
>> https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/files/... ? (This is
>> the URL given on the home page.)
> Actually, no. The actual home page, according to Debain, is
> http://www.kotnet.org/~ski
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer skribis:
> Do we have any guidelines regarding what packages go in what files, or
> is it determined on an "intuitive" basis?
The latter. :-)
That’s not ideal, but from my experience with Nixpkgs, it’s hard to find
a formal categorization scheme that would be reall
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> On 09/01/2014 03:33 PM, Marek Benc wrote:
>> Disregard my previous email, I figured it out.
>>
>> Here is my favorite text editor. This is my first package, so I'm sorry
>> if I messed up somewhere.
>> The formatting is probably bad, but every package seemed to be form
Cyril Roelandt writes:
> Maybe we should have all vi-like editors in one file. We currently have
> vim in gnu/packages/vim.scm, maybe we should have both nvi and vim in
> gnu/packages/vi.scm, WDYT ?
I think at least Vim is, on the meanwhile, a very different beast from
any random vi implementati
On 09/01/2014 03:33 PM, Marek Benc wrote:
> Disregard my previous email, I figured it out.
>
> Here is my favorite text editor. This is my first package, so I'm sorry
> if I messed up somewhere.
> The formatting is probably bad, but every package seemed to be formatted
> slightly differently, so
On 09/02/2014 10:19 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi!
Hello,
Could you send an updated patch in the format produced by ‘git
format-patch’, and with a ChangeLog-style commit log? See “Submitting
Patches” in the ‘HACKING’ file for details.
Will do.
+(uri
+ (string-append "http
Hi!
Marek Benc skribis:
> Disregard my previous email, I figured it out.
OK, perfect. :-)
> Here is my favorite text editor. This is my first package, so I'm
> sorry if I messed up somewhere.
> The formatting is probably bad, but every package seemed to be
> formatted slightly differently, so
Disregard my previous email, I figured it out.
Here is my favorite text editor. This is my first package, so I'm sorry
if I messed up somewhere.
The formatting is probably bad, but every package seemed to be formatted
slightly differently, so I don't know.
--- a/gnu/packages/nvi.scm2014-0
10 matches
Mail list logo
