Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:13:28AM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> Also, is it OK to do things like that in a snippet as in the attached
>> patch?
>
>> * gnu/packages/serialization.scm (msgpack): New variable.
>
> I think it's fine and I pushed as d1ef573de. If we need to chan
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:13:28AM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> Also, is it OK to do things like that in a snippet as in the attached
> patch?
> * gnu/packages/serialization.scm (msgpack): New variable.
I think it's fine and I pushed as d1ef573de. If we need to change it for
libring, we'll do that
Thank you for looking at this!
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:59:06AM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > I'm curious — how close are you to a Ring package definition?
>>
>> There are some more dependencies that might be needed, that I noticed
>>
Lukas Gradl writes:
> As I said I will post two patches later (pjproject & libring). Any help
> on those or some of the missing inputs is of course greatly appreciated!
Here they are!
pjproject still fails to build one of its components (pjmedia) because
of a missing include (resamplesubs.h).
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:59:06AM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > I'm curious — how close are you to a Ring package definition?
>
>
> According to
> https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/ring/index.php/Build_Instructions,
> Ring is divided into three Layers:
> *
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:55:45AM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > I'm curious — how close are you to a Ring package definition?
>
> Yes, packaging Ring is taking longer than I expected (on my side that
> is). I will send a detailed update within the next two hours.
I didn'
Leo Famulari writes:
> I'm curious — how close are you to a Ring package definition?
According to
https://tuleap.ring.cx/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/ring/index.php/Build_Instructions,
Ring is divided into three Layers:
* Libring (or ring-daemon)
* LibringClient
* Clints
I have a work-in-progress
Hi,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello!
>
> Sorry for the late reply, but…
>
> Lukas Gradl skribis:
>
>> All the files that do get installed in the output path of
>> msgpack in the store do not contain the hash part of the store-path of
>> zlib. They only refer to zlib by name.
>
>
Hello!
Lukas Gradl skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply, but…
>>
>> Lukas Gradl skribis:
>>
>>> All the files that do get installed in the output path of
>>> msgpack in the store do not contain the hash part of the store-path of
>>> zlib.
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:44:16PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> Lukas Gradl writes:
>>
>> > So the flags -I, -L, -l for zlib are all there for both dynamic and
>> > static linking. But still no store reference.
>>
>> I think the reason why there is no reference is that
Hello!
Sorry for the late reply, but…
Lukas Gradl skribis:
> All the files that do get installed in the output path of
> msgpack in the store do not contain the hash part of the store-path of
> zlib. They only refer to zlib by name.
What kind of files are these, and how do they refer to zlib
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:44:16PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> Lukas Gradl writes:
>
> > So the flags -I, -L, -l for zlib are all there for both dynamic and
> > static linking. But still no store reference.
>
> I think the reason why there is no reference is that msgpack uses
> zbuffer only for
Lukas Gradl writes:
> So the flags -I, -L, -l for zlib are all there for both dynamic and
> static linking. But still no store reference.
I think the reason why there is no reference is that msgpack uses
zbuffer only for tests. Before compilation, the file only references
the name "zlib" and d
Hi,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:58:52PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:24:23PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> > Oh, that is true. I searched around, but I could not find anything
>> > about zbuffer.h[pp]. I am not sure what it is used for. FWIW,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:58:52PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:24:23PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> > Oh, that is true. I searched around, but I could not find anything
> > about zbuffer.h[pp]. I am not sure what it is used for. FWIW, it is
> > only referenced in src/M
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:24:23PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> Oh, that is true. I searched around, but I could not find anything
> about zbuffer.h[pp]. I am not sure what it is used for. FWIW, it is
> only referenced in src/Makefile, src/Makefile.in, src/Makefile.am
> CMakeLists.txt and in the
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 06:56:38PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> It seems that zlib is only required for tests. In README and README.md
>> zlib is never mentioned among the dependencies, which also supports
>> that it is only needed for tests. I was not aware of that befo
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 06:56:38PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> It seems that zlib is only required for tests. In README and README.md
> zlib is never mentioned among the dependencies, which also supports
> that it is only needed for tests. I was not aware of that before (Shame
> on me).
Is zlib
Hi,
I am sorry for the long silence, this week was busy and I did not find a
lot of time to look into this. My apologies for that!
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:07:37AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:50:41PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> > * gnu/pa
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:07:37AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:50:41PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/serialization.scm (msgpack): New variable.
>
> > +(inputs
> > + `(("zlib" ,zlib)))
>
> I noticed that the output does not refer to zlib:
>
> $ g
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:50:41PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> * gnu/packages/serialization.scm (msgpack): New variable.
> +(inputs
> + `(("zlib" ,zlib)))
I noticed that the output does not refer to zlib:
$ guix gc --references $(./pre-inst-env guix build msgpack)
/gnu/store/8m00x5x8ykma
Hi,
Thank you for your review!
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:50:41PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>>
>> Hello Guix,
>>
>> Attached is a patch for the c/c++ version of msgpack. This is a
>> dependency of the Ring.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>
>> From 25eef52146bc84e83d90e429a0
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:50:41PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>
> Hello Guix,
>
> Attached is a patch for the c/c++ version of msgpack. This is a
> dependency of the Ring.
>
> Thank you!
>
> From 25eef52146bc84e83d90e429a0a2a5ca607280bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lukas Gradl
> Date: Mon
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 03:50:41PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> * gnu/packages/serialization.scm (msgpack): New variable.
LGTM. Waiting on a response to some questions about the 'googletest'
dependency.
Hello Guix,
Attached is a patch for the c/c++ version of msgpack. This is a
dependency of the Ring.
Thank you!
>From 25eef52146bc84e83d90e429a0a2a5ca607280bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Gradl
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 15:46:29 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: serialization: Add msgpack.
* g
25 matches
Mail list logo
